Wednesday, October 14, 2009,
12:25 AM
Sometimes in proving statements, there are some crucial steps that may not seem clear, and so have to be justified rigorously.
Often I have lost marks for hand-waving certain arguments when writing proofs in exams. When I tell my lecturer that it's clear, he says no, you have to justify.
In life, it is sometimes not that straightforward. Quote Yu Shih-Hsien, "Life is not that simple, ya..."
So... how? Should I take the finesse, or should I try a squeeze? Or perhaps endplay my opponents?
After awhile, you ask yourself, does a solution exist? Naturally, the next to ask is, is it unique?
Then sometimes you think it is. Sometimes you think it is not. Sometimes you just don't bother. Sometimes you just don't even know.
Currently, all you can do is say, "You're Terry, wright? Yeah I thought so."
~Falcon, OUT!!!
